Hot Storm

So You Think You Can (stormy weather) Destroy Evidence With Fire

No comments

By Rachel Yoshida

 Criminals will go to almost any lengths to cover their tracks when they commit a crime that will send them to jail. Starting a fire deliberately will send them to jail also, but sometimes the act they committed will be worse than a fire. People have been using fire to destroy evidence and cover up crimes for hundreds of years or longer and probably at the top of the list is murder.

These days some criminals have learned the hard way that using fire to cover up a crime might not be as easy as it used to be. There have been so many new techniques developed to bring the truth straight out of the ashes. It should make any law breaker afraid of relying on a fire to get away with anything.

In the first place, a criminal will sometimes use some sort of accelerant to start the fire and it is easy for fire investigators to spot this today. They might also use a lighter or matches, but when they use accelerants to start the fire it is a more reliable way to ensure the fire will burn longer and hotter than using other methods. Trained dogs can be used to sniff out accelerants like gasoline, charcoal starter, or other flammable liquids that a criminal might use.

Murderers make the mistake of thinking that a fire can destroy a human body to the point that it can not be identified, but dental records or any trace of DNA can still be use for identification. A murderer might also think that a fire will cover up the cause of a death, but that is not necessarily true either. If there is any usable remains left, many times a coroner will be able to find the cause of death especially if a poison or sever trauma to the body was used.

So actually, when it comes to using fires to cover up crimes today, there is a very good possibility that someone will still be caught and prosecuted for their crime. It is no sure bet that a fire will destroy all evidence that can the guilt of someone or the actual facts of a case. If someone wants to get away with something, they might want to look for an alternative to setting fire to the scene because it is no where near as reliable as it once was.

Rachel Yoshida is a writer of many topics, visit some of her sites, like

Water Damage Restoration and Chicago Water Damage Restoration.

Find Out The Latest Details On Weather Forecasts Around The World

What Is The Mathematical Probability That Man Evolved From An Ape?
By Russ Miller

 The more we learn about human DNA the more apparent it becomes that Darwinists are blowing hot air with their claims that some apelike creature lurks in man’s ancestral closet.

Scientists who study such things say that human DNA molecules EACH contain enough hereditary data to fill a 500,000-page book. This data is translated by enzymes, all of which are encoded to protect against mutational defects. Both the genetic data and the enzymes that decode the information had to be there from the very start.

For this reason, gradual evolution makes no sense at all.

Still, Darwinists teach that mankind evolved over long periods of time from some sort of an unknown apelike ancestor, often claiming that Human DNA is 98% the same as the DNA found in a chimpanzee.

Let’s examine the truth and determine if this claim has any integrity or validity.

As far as the integrity of this claim, it was based on only about 1% of the total genome. The 1% that was compared was the part controlling body design. Since people and apes have two arms and two legs, the fact that this portion of their DNA strands is rather similar was to be expected. To promote the claim that this proves we are 98% the same in our overall DNA as a chimpanzee is plainly dishonest and highly misleading.

So what about the viability of the claim that people evolved from apes?

Nature magazine has reported that as real science gets into the genome the wider the gap in genetic similarities becomes between man and ape. In fact, scientific studies reveal that there is at least a 7.7% difference between ape DNA and human DNA.

How big of a difference is that?

Well, consider that you contain about three billion base pairs of genetic information in every single one of your DNA-carrying cells throughout your entire body (Do you really think that this kind of complex data formed without any intelligence behind it?).

Just a 7.7% difference between a human’s genetic data and the gene pool found in a chimpanzee would mathematically require 231,000,000 beneficial and new genetic-information-adding mutations to take place in order to change a chimp into a human.

But not even ONE is possible.

Keep these two facts in mind:

First, science knows of no way for nature to add appreciable amounts of new and beneficial genetic information to an existing gene pool.

Second, so many mutations are fatal that there is no mathematical possibility of stringing together 231 million in a row without exterminating the potential evolving individual.

So why don’t Darwinists stop promoting misleading information and just bring out the real evidence that we evolved from a single-celled creature?

Because there is not any real evidence to back up their claims.

Russ Miller is author of The GENESIS Report Series. Register at http://www.new-earth-thought.com to receive FREE his 50 Facts vs. Darwinism e-mail series.

Biodiesel and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
By Joseph

 It is normal for people to weigh possible fuel alternatives. In fact, that is about the only way to find out which one is the best. Definitely, you would like to find out the best alternative which can help you save money the most and the best option for your automobile and the earth.

You have to look at many contributing factors. Do not make a choice base on popularity because being popular may not be the best. Get the facts and learn what you can so your decision is an informed one.

Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)

CNG, Compressed Natural Gas, is an alternative fuel. It is mostly available only in in California, although it can be found randomly throughout the United States. Only CNG vehicles can use CNG as a fuel source. Home based production is possible through a special unit available mostly from manufacturers of CNG vehicles.

CNG also has been criticized for producing high levels of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.Also it provides less power than regular fuel. CNG, however, is more affordable compared to any other fuel alternative.

Looking at Biodiesel

Biodiesel is made from vegetable oil, lye and ethanol. It is a safe fuel that does not have the high risk of explosion or fire. It runs smooth and offers the same level of power as regular diesel fuel Biodiesel can also be used in any vehicle that currently uses diesel fuel.

Biodiesel can be sourced out from gas stations around the country. %LINK2% is also possible. Biodiesel burns clean and produces no emissions.

The Bottom Line

Between CNG and Biodiesel, the latter appears to be more user friendly. Moreover supply is more accessible. You are not required to invest on equipment to make it either. Biodiesel production is doable since inputs are readily available from commonly used everyday items .

Biodiesel is also much safer. It is environment friendly since it contains no pollutive components. It also will not reduce the power your vehicle has so you will not notice the switch to an alternative fuel.

CNG may prove to be more applicable to consumers residing in California and those with funds for running a CNG vehicle For the majority of people who do not live in California and can not afford to buy a CNG vehicle or the CNG equipment to refuel, biodiesel is a much better choice.

Consider biodiesel as the best alternative fuel. You can first have Biodiesel for your car as a start. Learn more about homemade biodiesel by going to our website at http://www.biodieselathome.biz

weather

Thursday, September 25th, 2008 at 8:30 am and is filed under science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.